Some time ago many of us
tried to make a list of all the blatant lies and untruths said by, or
on behalf of, the McCanns and the Tapas 7. So long was the list that
eventually it had to go to print in shortened form. Here I have tried to
pinpoint things said by relatives and friends, who perhaps thought
they were being supportive and helpful, but which, and who, turned
out not to be. Some of the things said
either damaged the “official story” as it was at the time -
because as we know even that has changed with the seasons - or caused
researchers to focus on the point being made.
All the stories told to
the press by close relatives and friends about broken, smashed,
forced, and ’jimmied - or whatever the word is . . “ shutters,
and doors hanging off hinges are directly traceable back to the
McCanns. The sources concerned had clearly been given the same story,
and urged to contact the press. Ça, on ne sait pas. Some degree of embellishment may be
expected, but the overall story from at least five sources is
remarkably consistent. The fact that the British
press and media put out those stories, across the country, at the
same time that live video was being streamed on news channels showing
a hapless Scenes of Crime officer attempting to find a mark on
obviously Un-smashed, -jimmied, -forced, or -broken shutters was the
starting point for scepticism for many of us.
1st prize Uncle John
McCann - Maddy’s ‘jammies.
Pride of place must
surely go to Uncle John. According to John McCann:
"Kate dressed Amelie in her sister's pyjamas and the baby said:
'Maddy's jammies. Where is Maddy?' Even the devout Kate (see
later) must cringe when she reads that.
‘Out of the mouths of
babes and sucklings’ Matthew 21:16
In two words Amelie
demonstrated
a) The pyjamas were
Madeleine’s - and logically therefore Madeleine was not wearing
them when she ‘disappeared’. The implications of this are surely
obvious.
b) There were no
duplicate pyjamas owned and worn by Amelie, as the McCanns
mendaciously and unconvincingly claimed later, when they realised
they had been caught out having shown Madeleine’s pyjamas in
public. Attrapés, comment ?
b) Madeleine was known as
Maddy within the family, despite the subsequent mendacious insistence
by Kate that this contraction was an invention of the press. Amelie
neatly corroborates everything the world already knew. Not bad for 2 words from
a 2 year old ! Many thanks to Uncle John for telling the world.
2nd Susan Healy - Kate’s
mother - medication.
The whole history of
denials that the children had been given any sedatives or other
drugs, or whether they had been sedated by anyone else has been
researched in detail and reported elsewhere. Over four years the
McCanns’ story moved from initial recognition and acceptance, to
outright denial, back to implied acceptance of possibility, then
strenuous resumed denials, using the words “ludicrous, nonsense, no
suggestion”, and then finally to a renewed acceptance of the
possibility, followed by public statements that it MUST have
happened. (though one came from the risible David Edgar, and so may
be cheerful ignored). Kate’s mother was more
succinct . ’They took Calpol’.
3rd Clarence Mitchell -
wristwatches and mobile phones
Mitchell deserves a
special study. His ability to invent stories, to lie, to ‘spin’,
and otherwise to distort the truth is in a class of its own. Pages,
if not volumes, of his mendacious howlers have been documented, and
it quickly became normal for anyone with genuine interest in the case
to start by believing the exact opposite of whatever he had said -
until the contrary could be proved. Mostly it couldn’t. It will be interesting to
see if work such as his is included in any attempt to clamp down on
“Fake News”
One of Clarence
Mitchell’s more notorious outright falsehoods was to the effect
that none of the group had watches or mobile phones with them, and
that therefore the exact times they gave were not to be taken as
wholly accurate. Unfortunately for him he said this in April 2008,
nearly a year after the Tapas7 group had drawn up two separate and
detailed time lines on the night, and a third mutually agreed
amalgamation of both, but also the statements of the Tapas 7, of
Gerry McCann “When asked at what time he went to check on the
children the night Madeleine disappeared, he recalls that this was
around 21:04 according to his watch”, and subsequently Kate McCann
in her book “by his watch”, all contradict his mendacious
assertion.
He backtracked six weeks
later. Quite why Mitchell invented, or was asked to tell this
particular lie is difficult to understand. What it did however, was
to prove even to the most loyal McCann supporter that facts were now
largely irrelevant to the ‘official story’, and that nothing
Mitchell said could be believed.
4th Grandma Healy -
again. Religion
According to the official
line the McCanns were, or are, a religious Roman Catholic couple.
Evidence adduced for this was their calling for a priest soon after
reporting Madeleine missing, a very early trip to Rome to meet the
Pope - both in preference to searching for their missing child -
private use of the local church and many other reported issues.
Kate’s publicly
reported “Forgiveness” for the alleged predatory paedophile who
has been holding, and we may suppose abusing, Madeleine for the past
decade is a matter of record, but is set against her published hatred
and wish to harm the man who was leading the investigation into the
disappearance. The Press did their duty
with ‘Their family says the couple's ordeal has left their staunch
Catholic faith undimmed.' For clarification we may
need to heed the words of Kate’s mother, Susan Healy, “Kate and Gerry were
not the most devout family."
5th Grandma Healy - YET
again. Size of her daughters ‘décolletage’. “Mrs Healy has been a
staunch defender of her daughter and has spoken out in the past about
how Mrs McCann has felt persecuted by parts of the media. Last October, she claimed
that her daughter, Kate told her: “If I weighed another two stone,
had a bigger bosom and looked more maternal, people would be more
sympathetic.
Special Award
Philomena McCann /
Philomena Rickwood / Mrs Tony Rickwood - deserves a special place in
the pantheon of those who have, through crass stupidity, demand for
the lime-light, lack of attention to detail when they were being
instructed what to say, and for many other reasons, have compromised
the McCanns’ situation beyond recognition. She is one of Gerry’s
sisters. These are extracts from
interviews - all in the public domain.
• PM: Absolutely. It
was hours before the local police turned up and we're talking two
bobbies that totally downplayed the incident and said that Maddie had
maybe just wandered off, and that... but what 3-year-old would wander
off for hours on their own? It took the CID 5 hours before they
responded to come and even then it was, kind of, shrug of the
shoulders. Kate in her book says
(elle ne peut pas gravers un mensonge dans la pierre, mais elle mentira face aux caméras) they were there by 11.10pm, considerably less than an hour after
having been contacted, by whoever actually did. And then Kate adds “By midnight, however,
evidently they were concerned enough to inform the PJ . . . based in
the town of Portimao, twenty miles or so from Praia da Luz, and took
over an hour to arrive. La GNR était parfaitement capable de gérer une histoire d'enfant égarée. So the PJ were there by
1am. Less than 3 hours from the confused report of a missing child.
“Kind of, shrug
of the shoulders “ : this hardly corresponds
to the reality of the National Guard organising a massive search of
the area with local people and holiday makers overnight, the seizing
of CCTV images, monitoring of the airport and the bridge between
Portugal and Spain, a team of PJ giving up rest days and cancelling
family holidays, sleeping in the incident room, some on sofas, some
on the floor, queuing for the ‘facilities’, all reported in
detail in Dr Amaral’s book “The Truth of the Lie”.
• PM: She was sleeping
between her brother and sister. Not according to the
McCanns, who say she was in a bed and the twins were in cots.
• PM: Gerry and Kate
are in a clear line of sight of their kids. They regularly go across
to check; maybe if the kids have been disturbed or crying or anything
and if they'd come out the front they would have seen them. They were not in clear
sight of anything, and if the children had ‘come out of the FRONT’
they would have been entirely invisible. In any event the McCanns’
own account and sketch in the PJ documentation prepared by them,
shows the McCanns sitting with their backs to the apartment.
• PM: I mean, you
can hear his voice breaking. His wife, she can barely stand up. She
can't sleep, she can't eat. But she can laugh and
joke and go jogging.
• PM: Part of it is
that they're, errm... trying to get Kate to admit to having
accidentally killed Madeleine and disposed of her body... hidden and
disposed of her body - which is complete nonsense. Errr... It has no
factual basis whatsoever and, looking at the scenario: assuming that
when they'd gone home, early evening, Kate has murdered her daughter
and then gone out for some convivial company with friends, sat and
had a meal and later rai... you know, raised an alarm - but sat
through all that perfectly normal with people and then done it.
PM: They
tried to get Kate to, errr... confess to having accidentally killed,
errr... Madeleine by offering her a deal through her lawyer, which
was: 'If you say that you killed Madeleine by accident; and then hid
her; and then disposed of the body, errr... then we can guarantee you
a two-year jail sentence or even less. You may get off because people
feel sorry for you; it was an accident.’ This is impossible under
Portuguese Law. It is an invention by Kate, though Philomena’s use
of the word ‘murder’, and then changing this to ‘killed by
accident’ may be revealing. In fact, as the world
knows, the PJ were suggesting no such thing.
• PM : As far
as I know they've changed their status and they are suspects.
Q: ”Does this mean that
they are now formal suspects?
PM: : Yes that's
true. The McCanns and their
spokesman subsequently spent a huge amount of effort and money
persuading the public and Leveson LJ that “arguido” did NOT mean
suspect - even though it clearly does.
• PM: But he's not the
main suspect, for some unknown reason there's something about a
sniffer dog sniffing Kate. Suddenly a dog can talk and says she
smelled a death. How can that be when a British sniffer dog came out
months after Madeleine's case. They're doctors, if there's a smell of
death on them could that possibly be a patient? No it couldn’t. Doctors
do not go on holiday wearing unwashed work clothes soiled by bodily
fluids from cadavers they have examined a fortnight earlier, and then
not change, or wash the clothes, for 3 months. Very few people
would do this.
• PM: Errr... yes, they
absolutely will cooperate with the police. They are more than
prepared to undergo more questioning. We now know that Kate, on
her own admission, refused to answer 48 questions put by the police,
and that both refused to co-operate further, to the point of
concealing the existence of the Pool photo, and fleeing the country
when the enquiry started to heat up.
• PM: Kate and Gerry
are loving parents; they tried so hard to have children. They had to
undergo IVF; Kate had difficult pregnancies. Kate reports that her
first pregnancy was “Totally without complication. No sickness, no
back pain, no bleeding, no swelling. I felt great.”
• PM: Yes, I do think
she's still alive. We have had no evidence contrary to that and as
for cadaver dogs sniffing death on Kate; I mean, what is she? Lassie?
Is she gonna speak to them and ask what they're smelling? Kate's a
doctor - what does this mean? You know, they've been given a team
that send her to go and sniff Kate's clothes and the dogs are told
what to do. If they start barking, how are we supposed to interpret
that? Except, perhaps, they're ‘barking’. Yet another person who
cares nothing for the reliability of cadaver and blood dogs (one wonders what her,
and their collective, attitude is towards Cancer detection dogs, or
drugs and explosive detection dogs, widely and increasingly used
across the world.)
These are only some from
the almost endless store of Philomena gibbering nonsense. To sum up, the net effect
of almost everything said by Philomena has been either wrong,
distorted, or has drawn attention to facts - which are ALL against
the ‘Official Story’. Small wonder then that
after a fairly short interval she was shut down, and has gone back
into obscurity . . . except that her influence on the children of
Ullapool is undiminished.
(...)
In the accounts for 2008
the figure for setting up the website is given as £ 37,071 (Thirty
seven THOUSAND).
A website, even of the
complexity it now has, seven main pages, some with supplementary
pages, and a Shop page, would cost a professional website master less
than £ 2,000 (TWO thousand) to set up and to run for a year.
Note that the
Professional fees for creating the “Fund”, which we assume refers
to solicitors, Bates Wells Braithwaite, a top of the range firm,
based in central London, amounts only to £ 36,070. ‘Accountants’
(Haysmacintyre ?) is shown separately, as £ 7,050.
So we are asked to
believe that a teenaged school leaver, in Ullapool, charged more than
one and quarter times the average wage for Scotland, (£ 28,296 in
2008) to produce a relatively simple web site, available
off-the-peg.
Cost of a Large-Sized
Website
Website costs increase
considerably as you move up in scale. With multiple sections, 40 to
50 pages and lots of functionality, large websites are ideal for big
companies or established online brands. The website was created
by Calum MacRea, a police officer’s son, then aged 18. An article in the
Scottish ‘Sunday Herald’, reported that he had been designing
websites “since he was 10”. He had allegedly been approached by
Gerry’s sister, the egregious Philomena, previously his teacher,
within four days of Madeleine’s being reported missing. So what are the
possibilities?
1. Callum MacRae invoiced
the “Fund” for £ 37,071. The accountants signed it off and he
was paid this amount. If so, this is potentially fraudulent.
2. Callum McRae was paid
no such amount, but it has been entered as “creative accounting”,
and the actual cash has gone elsewhere. If so, then two further
possibilities arise.
a. Haysmacintyre did not
know and did not notice
b. Haysmacintyre DID
know, but let it pass anyway
The first option suggests
incompetence, the second, fraud.
3. Is there another
option ? Is there a sensible explanation ? If so, I confess I cannot
see what it might be.
Post scriptum
To the above we have to
add the strange dealings with criminal organisations and people
posing as Private detective agencies, such as M3 and Halligen; the
extremely suspicious way in which ALPHAIG was set up as a company
some time after Mitchell had announced the contract; the lack of
transparency of the “fund’ from its inception; the threats of
action for defamation by the Solicitors and accountants when
pertinent questions were raised; the sudden withdrawal by the
accountants - apparently without having prepared a final account...
Over the past decade I
have looked at this case and dissected bits of it, trying to decide
what parts of the story are credible and to distinguish them from
what is frankly not, and to try to see which parts were pure
fabrication. So I am now prepared to rise to the challenge, and to
present my “purported’ theory. I thank all those who have led me
to this point, but stress that this, and all the mistakes and
inaccuracies which may be found are entirely mine. I would hope that
any inaccuracy or misinterpretation could be pointed out or
explained, so I may revise my idea, as everyone should on being
confronted with new evidence.
What do I think happened
to Madeleine ?
- On Saturday night she
did not sleep - a combination of excitement and her documented habit
of wandering into the parents’ room during the night.
Discussion - Kate tells
us this in her book, (p. 59) and there is evidence from the “Star
Chart” in the Rothley house, and family members. Excitement and
over-tiredness on the first day of a holiday is normal.
- On Sunday evening she
and the twins were therefore all given a sedative with their
documented ‘cup of tea and a biscuit’. The twins sleep. This
continued during the week.
Discussion - Kate tells
us in the book that she suspected sedation from the start. Both she
and Fiona Payne are qualified anaesthetists; Kate specialised in
paediatrics. Strangely neither report that they took any of the
medically appropriate steps towards the twins on the night of 3/5/7,
leading to a inference that both know exactly what had been given and
therefore had no concerns.
- Madeleine did not sleep
well and during the evening got out of bed, went into the parent’s
room, found they were not there, and climbed onto the sofa to look
out of the window to see where they were.
Discussion - One of the
early theories involved Madeleine ‘wandering off’. Even if those
particular shutters had been closed she would not be aware of them,
only of the curtains, and would have tried to look out. We were told
definitively that Madeleine could not have opened the sliding doors,
even though they were allegedly unlocked.
- She fell down the back
of the sofa, and because the gap was narrow and she was sleepy, was
unable to break her fall with her hands. She may have struck her head
or face first on the sill as she slipped forward. She landed head
first on the terrazzo floor, and some time during the night died of a
sub-arachnoid haemorrhage, with light bleeding from the ear and
possibly the nose and mouth.
Discussion - The ‘Eeyore’
pyjamas were washed because of the “large brown stain” (p.63) and
then dried and photographed on the blue sofa, but then they became
confused about what they had said, and why they would have taken a
photo of the pyjamas in the first place, and subsequently held them
up at a news conference in Berlin on 6th June 2007, describing them
as “the ones she was abducted in”. This was confirmed by uncle
John McCann when he reported that Amelie had been dressed in the
garments and had immediately identified them saying “Maddie’s
jammies. Where is Maddie ?”
- Bleeding would have
been confined to some small leakage from an ear - possibly including
cerebrospinal fluid, typical of brain damage - and from the mouth and
nose, which stops once the heart stops. The parents came back late,
crept very quietly into their room and went to bed without checking
the children
Discussion - There is
evidence from other sources that on some nights the parents stayed
out into the early hours, and in the book this is admitted (p.60)
- In the morning they see
the empty bed, and during the frantic search find Madeline’s body
behind the sofa, by now stiff and cold and leaking bodily fluids. In
her grief Kate holds and cuddles the body tightly to herself,
covering her own clothes and cuddle-cat in cadaverine, which is
detected a long time later. She then stays with the twins in the
bedroom, getting them dressed and ready, and cuddling them both,
holding them all tight to her. Cadaverine is transferred to the red T
shirt worn by Sean at this stage, which was alerted to later, and to
whatever Amelie was wearing. Meanwhile Gerry puts Madeleine’s
little body into the blue Tennis bag, and places it under the bushes
in the garden, so that it will not be seen by the cleaner - if she
comes, nor by the twins.
Discussion - The little
gate at the bottom of the steps keeps everyone out. In Spain and
Portugal there are very few dogs roaming around. The chances of a
random intruder entering, searching, finding a bag of ‘stuff’
under a bush and deciding to steal it - without looking inside are -
in the author’s estimation, slightly less than the chances of an
abduction = 0.
- During Monday the bag
is left in the flower bed, and the cleaner does not see it. The sofa
is pushed fully back against the curtains and the cleaner does not
bother pulling it out to clean behind it. Kate goes to the
supermarket to make purchases (p. 56) - perhaps including cleaning
fluids.
Discussion - The bag may
have been brought indoors for Monday night, and placed on the shelf.
Bodies do not begin to smell strongly for some time. But if left in
the garden it would have assisted the cooling, as the air temperature
fell to 10º C (50º F) during the night of 30/4/7/- 1/5/7
- There was a suggestion
that the cleaner might have been sent away on the Monday. In any
event a quick clean two days into a one week holiday does not involve
anything much more than beds, bathroom and kitchen area. Moving
furniture and cleaning underneath and behind it is confined to the
day of departure or a deep “spring’ clean. Even if the cleaner
did move the sofa, she would simply mop with bleach. Personal
problems, stains, spills, leakages, soiled sheets and towels are
nothing to comment about if you are a cleaner in a holiday resort.
The amount of leakage is unlikely to have been much, would probably
have been mopped up by the parents, and with three very young
children, two in night-time nappies, in an apartment a certain amount
of ‘soiling’ would be well within a middle aged Portuguese
cleaner’s comprehension and be totally unremarkable. Robert Murat
is summoned, and arrives early on Tuesday. He offers the assistance
of a nearby hotel, which has outhouses and chest freezers. Gerry, in
full tennis kit, and carrying the tennis bag is able to take
Madeleine there and conceal her. Possibly by taxi, or perhaps in
Murat’s rented car, and giving some meaning to Gerry’s quote:
“I’m not going to answer that . . .” when asked whether he knew
Murat previously.
Discussion - Murat had
rented a car, as his own was allegedly in for repair (according to
his statement). Some may argue that the body might have started to
smell by that stage, but Tuesday is only 36 hrs post mortem. Some
studies of dead piglets have reported that putrefaction only starts
being noticeable to humans at 2-3 days, (but discoverable by dogs
within 90 minutes of death). Bin liners and air fresheners are on
sale in the supermarket.
- Gerry returns and
spends much of the next few days playing tennis at every opportunity
to establish his credentials. The now empty tennis bag is placed on
the shelf, and the process of scent transference starts
Discussion - despite the
denials, the blue tennis bag is clearly visible on the photos taken
during the night of 3-4/5/7. It then disappears from the record and
like the pink Princess blanket has never been traced. The spot on
which the blue tennis bag is shown is the exact point at which the
cadaver dog alerts - and it alerts to no other place in that room.
The depth of detail in the book about each of the tennis sessions is
extremely suspicious. On one day he was reported to have had an
injury to the Achilles tendon, which prevented his playing tennis
during the afternoon, but was able to resume later that same day.
This has not been confirmed.
- The conspiracy is
hatched with the entire group. After the dreadful event of the Sunday
night they all pull together and ensure nothing else could ever
happen like that to the other children . . . and begin to work out
the strategy. This includes all the children being looked after by
one adult every evening.
Discussion - There is
much circumstantial evidence to support this theory. It is concealed
in statements about recurrent illness accounting for the absence at
dinner every night of at least one of the group.
- The planning stage
concentrates on large issues, but neglects details like cuddle cat,
the pink blanket, and the pyjamas. It also neglects the weather,
ambient temperature, evidence to be deduced from the lack of
photographs and video recording, and the sheer implausibility of the
half hourly checks being made by everyone every evening. It becomes
overcomplicated with far too much detail and precision being offered.
Discussion - At some
stage during that week the Pool Photo - which may be the last or
penultimate photo of Madeleine, is selected as ‘proof’ of her
continued existence on 3/5/7, and an elaborate strategy is developed,
firstly to ensure the Polícia Judiciária never obtain a copy,
(included in GM’s second statement in which he affirms and signs
that he has no further photos in his possession, only to produce the
Pool Photo via Mitchell exactly three weeks later ) and secondly to
falsify the time and date. It is clear that the Pool Photo CANNOT
POSSIBLY have been taken at lunchtime on 3/5/7, and is most likely or
almost certainly - considerably beyond the test of the ‘balance of
probabilities’ - to have been taken at lunchtime on Sunday 29th
April.
- The date for the
discovery is deliberately chosen to allow the Police one whole day to
take statements before they had to allow people to leave on Saturday,
but not to allow them two whole days to conduct follow up interviews
or detain witnesses when inconsistencies began to show.
Discussion - The Tapas 7
mostly return to the UK on Saturday 5/5/7 as planned and are replaced
with close McCann family members who close ranks
I think this fits with
what we know. Whether it is accurate or near the truth is an entirely
different issue. What I do not know is WHY ?
Shortly after reporting
Madeleine missing, the McCanns selected -VERY CAREFULLY and very
quickly
- Metodo 3 whose
principal investigators went to prison for 4 years, involving :
Francisco Marco who was
appointed in September 2007, or possibly earlier, by the McCanns and
their advisers, to head their much-vaunted ‘search for Madeleine’.
He was the boss of the disreputable downtown Barcelona detective
agency, Metodo 3. The agency had been in constant trouble with the
authorities, having been caught up in a telephone tapping scandal in
the 1990s, when all their top staff were arrested. During the period
leading up to Christmas 2007, his staff did not look for Madeleine.
They were busy promoting fake sightings to keep up the pretence that
Madeleine had been abducted. In the lead-up to Christmas, he was
exposed as a serial, and practiced liar. He said he knew Madeleine
was alive. He maintained his men ‘knew where she was being held’.
He claimed his men were ‘closing in on the kidnappers’, and
finally promised that ‘Maddie will be home by Christmas’. These
were all outright lies.
(Strangely the lawyers
for the McCanns denied in writing that he had said this, only later
to realise that Kate had included it in her book)
Antonio Giminez Raso -
once a high-flying Detective Inspector in the Regional Crime Squad of
Catalonia. He held a prime position in the Drugs and Human
Trafficking Department. This employment came to an end around the end
of 2004; whether he ‘resigned’ or was ‘pushed’ is unclear.
And Julian Peribañez -
who admitted in his book Cortina de Humo that he had been paid to
invent sightings of Madeleine in Morocco
Metodo 3 - was
investigated for money laundering after receiving € 30,000 from a
socialist politician, allegedly to prepare a report on a hazelnut
farm, which they simply copied from the internet.
- Kevin Halligen -
operating under the company name of Oakley, who was sentenced to a
term of imprisonment for wire fraud and (£1.2million) money
laundering. Mitchell told the world “The hunt for Madeleine is
becoming more and more international, and it was felt that a truly
international firm was now needed to lead the inquiry. These really
are the big boys. They are absolutely the best . . “ In fact Oakley
was not set up until after Madeleine had been reported missing. He
worked alongside
Henri Exton, QPM, OBE -
an ex-MI5 officer arrested for shoplifting and said to be a
specialist in investigating money laundering
Followed by
- The ALPHAIG 2 - David
Edgar and Arthur Cowley - who did not go to Barcelona to investigate
an allegedly strong lead, (but probably charged the “Fund” for
[not] doing so.) The pair who it seems continue to maintain that
Madeleine is being “held in a hellish lair in the lawless
hinterlands...”.
Again the egregious and
mendacious Mitchell led the world to believe that they were Alpha
Group Investigations – a non existent company, but with a name
similar to Alpha Investigations Group, a large internationally known
American company.
LFAIG was in fact
registered some time after the TV documentary in which their
appointment had been announced.
The McCanns immediately
made friends with and consorted with
Clement Freud - A known
Paedophile and pervert
Ray Wyre - A self
appointed expert in Paedophilia - who it later transpired was on the
Elm House list of visitors - for “whatever reason”
Jim Gamble - Sometime
head of CEOP, and another self appointed expert on Paedophilia, who
was notoriously silent and apparently inactive during the decades of
abuse of young white girls in Oldham, Rochdale, Bradford, Oxford, but
who went to Thailand to buy a young girl - ALLEGEDLY to see if it was
possible.
They were contacted and
assisted by
Gordon Brown - then
Chancellor of the Exchequer, who was instrumental in covering up the
details of the Hamilton / Dunblane massacre. His motives for this are
unknown, but there are serious rumours on the internet about his own
past activities and proclivities, for which he has neither issued a
denial nor sued.
Cherie Blair - wife of
Tony Blair, then PM, widely known as “Miranda”, and jokingly
referred to by his own Head of Chambers as “the nearest star to
Uranus”. Believed by some to have been fined for homosexual
indecency many years ago, under the name Charles Lynton (his middle
two names)
They accepted gifts from
Philip Green - noted for
his corrupt and greedy theft of many hundreds of millions from BHS,
before selling the totally destroyed company for £1 to another
fraudster, and for a long time refusing to assist the many hundreds
of defrauded members of the BHS pension scheme
Brian Kennedy - the
double glazing millionaire, represented by lawyer
Edward Smethurst - who
had been publicly criticised in a trial by a judge for his lack of
candour
They employed
HaysMcIntyre -
Accountants for the “Fund: who on due consideration and after the
publication of a damning revelation of the very simple and obvious
methods involved in defrauding the “Fund” and their apparent
total lack of any professional application of “Due Diligence” - -
- (Cortina de Humo) and some percipient questions in an Open Letter -
resigned without presenting even an interim final account
Michael Linnett - who was
then, as a retired Accountant and director, forced to take over
financial responsibility for the “Fund” but resigned within three
months. He died recently - (before he could be questioned about his
knowledge of what details he had found which caused him to resign)
They briefed Lawyers
Bates Wells Braithwaite -
who set up the "Fund" and apparently still act for it.
Their apparent lack of "Due dilligence" in the appointment
of various fraudulent firms and teams of bogus private detectives
seems to mirror that of HaysMcintyre q.v. This, combined with their
supposed neglect or refusal to attempt to reclaim the monies
defrauded from the "Fund" has been a matter of some
speculation.
Mishcon de Reya - who
specialise in preventing the extradition for proper trial of people
whose alleged actions are beyond comprehension by civilised people
Carter-Ruck - who
represent indefensible people in their attempts to keep disgusting
secrets hidden, often by threatening to inflict financial misery on
those who attempt to speak or discover the truth. The list of clients
subsequently found “guilty” of the very things C-R had alleged it
was libelous to state - is too long to include here.
They were represented by
PR agents
Bell-Pottinger - who
represented the most hideous and vile dictators and regimes across
the world, and the most wicked murderers, and whose company has
recently fallen apart when the true nature of their methods of
planting mendacious “false-news” was revealed. The company said
were paid £500,000 to keep the ‘abduction’ story on the front
pages of the Tabloid press for a year.
They were supported by
Father Jose Pacheco - who
comforted Gerry and Kate McCann in the days after Madeleine vanished
but later claimed that he had been the victim of some form of
deception. He gave them the keys to his church but left the parish
soon afterwards. He has said it was an extremely unpleasant situation
and the McCann family only ever brought him problems. He later added
that the McCanns had “ruined his life”
Sandy Cameron - brother
in law who helped deep clean the carpet in the boot of the hired car
prior to the search with cadaver and blood dogs - which nevertheless
alerted to the car and key fob
Philomena McCann -
sister, who took a leading role in the preparation of the “Dossier
of Death” which led ultimately to the death of Brenda Leyland, and
was probably involved in the Pool Photo conspiracy
Tony Rickwood - husband
of Philomena q.v. specialist in astronomy and creator of perverted
images of young women drowning in mud or quicksand, who probably had
a leading role in the Pool Photo conspiracy
They are supported by
Tracey Kandohla -
‘journalist’ for The Sun, whose articles have been mendacious,
ludicrous, or simply demonstrated a total lack of knowledge of the
facts of the case, or of the legal niceties that surround it. More
recent articles have been left with the Comments open and apparently
unmoderated, allowing the full extent of the public disbelief and
antagonism towards the McCanns’ story to be demonstrated
Various Shills - on
Twitter and Facebook. Many actively support the convicted child
murderers Leonor Cipriano and Joao Cipriano
Including
Nigel Nessling -
outspoken McCann supporter, who narrowly avoided imprisonment on
being found guilty of possession of over 40,000 indecent images of
children
Michael Shrimpton -
outspoken McCann supporter who claimed that Madeleine had been stolen
by a paedophile ring, and was then himself found guilty of possession
of pornographic images of children
And then a further very
strange link
Clarence Mitchell - The
official spokesman for the McCanns contacted
Cardinal Cormac Murphy
O’Connor - who had been on the point of being prosecuted for
failing to report priest Fr. Hill to the police for indecent assaults
on children, but who died before action could be taken - to arrange a
visit to Rome to meet
Pope Benedict XVI - who
as Cardinal Ratzinger and then as Pope, was involved with and then
became the head of an outrageous systematic and long term cover-up of
child sexual abuse by hundreds of thousands of homosexual pederast
priests - much of it covered up personally by him both as Cardinal in
Germany and then as Pope
They count as a personal
friend
Jon Corner - who released
a highly dubious photo of Madeleine, with adult make up and
accessories, and in exactly the same pose as one released by Graham
Ovenden, who received a long prison sentence for the creation of
child pornography
Res ipsa loquitur
And only yesterday
(28/2/18) we learned that the Government will not open Leveson 2. Let
us remind ourselves of the people who presented evidence to Leveson 1
The McCanns themselves -
who complained about press intrusion, without bothering to mention
that they had paid £ 500,000 to Bell Pottinger to keep their
Abduction story in the headlines for a year.
Hugh Grant - who
complained that the press had accurately reported his perverted
sexual conduct in a public place with a prostitute
Max Moseley - another
sexual deviant and incidentally a Nazi sympathiser, who complained
that the press had accurately reported his extreme S&M perversion
Why do the McCanns align
themselves with people like this ? We make no further comment
